Post by ryglo739 on Mar 16, 2024 6:32:06 GMT
But they are in fact real bots. The goal is very simple: to draw attention to an account by increasing its visibility. Growth which entails, for both brands and influencers , greater earning opportunities, higher rates and, in general, greater profits. The technology to detect fakes It's a shame that, as Instagram again points out, users are looking for "real experiences and genuine interactions". And precisely to guarantee them it is deemed necessary to intervene. As? Thanks to some high-tech software , capable of automatically identifying illicit activities and notifying them to account managers. From Instagram they explain that those who use the bot will be sent a request to change their password to allow the user to disconnect from external applications. Anyone who ignores.
Social and transparency: where are we at? Instagram is not the DX Leads only social network to have taken action to limit all those practices that falsify the user experience. In the second quarter of 2018, for example, Twitter lost as many as 9 million users worldwide. Is it the fault of a mass escape from the social network of the former 140 characters? Not exactly. In fact, this is the direct effect of a massive campaign created with the aim of eliminating bots, spam and "problematic" accounts. A drastic drop, justified and supported by the belief that improving the experience of those who frequent a virtual space, eliminating these unwanted accounts, can guarantee organic global growth in the long term.
Facebook has also implemented several campaigns against fakes on its platform since 2012. Thanks to machine learning algorithms, around 2 billion fake accounts were removed in the first six months of 2018 alone. The fear is that, between advertising and lack of transparency, users will abandon these social networks, turning towards platforms where interaction is more authentic. If, on the one hand, it is clear that the interest of those who own and manage social platforms is to stem the spread of mechanisms that deceive the user, there remains a regulatory void on the topic. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram are all private media companies that choose to self-regulate.
Social and transparency: where are we at? Instagram is not the DX Leads only social network to have taken action to limit all those practices that falsify the user experience. In the second quarter of 2018, for example, Twitter lost as many as 9 million users worldwide. Is it the fault of a mass escape from the social network of the former 140 characters? Not exactly. In fact, this is the direct effect of a massive campaign created with the aim of eliminating bots, spam and "problematic" accounts. A drastic drop, justified and supported by the belief that improving the experience of those who frequent a virtual space, eliminating these unwanted accounts, can guarantee organic global growth in the long term.
Facebook has also implemented several campaigns against fakes on its platform since 2012. Thanks to machine learning algorithms, around 2 billion fake accounts were removed in the first six months of 2018 alone. The fear is that, between advertising and lack of transparency, users will abandon these social networks, turning towards platforms where interaction is more authentic. If, on the one hand, it is clear that the interest of those who own and manage social platforms is to stem the spread of mechanisms that deceive the user, there remains a regulatory void on the topic. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram are all private media companies that choose to self-regulate.